Is Ethanol Really Beneficial?

Ethanol at first glance was viewed as an     astounding advance in fuel processing  technology. Ethanol appeared to be a success in other countries. Many Americans now are not buying it. Government officials are facing major opposition.

Currently at least 10 states have mandates that require the sell of ethanol. This is very disturbing news. Why should consumers be forced to pay for overpriced gasoline that could actually lower the performance of engines? Does anyone remember how angry Americans were over gas costing $4.00 a gallon? Do you think they’ll approve of higher gas prices due to ethanol?

It’s true that ethanol farmers are enjoying tax breaks, enormous subsidies, and more business. Maybe subsidies should be given for the production of food, to lower food prices instead.

And being that ethanol is the worst alternative fuel, federal dollars should be directed toward better alternatives. Solar, wind, geothermal, and hydropower are other sources that show promise, and are much more efficient.

Alternative fuel sources is a wonderful conception. But, the technology should be evolved. There should be a proven track record written in ink before Americans are forced to purchase anything. Should Americans be told what product to buy? Automobiles should be designed for optimal performance with regard to alternative fuels, and not pure gasoline only.

Until then nothing should be mandated.

Ethanol Disadvantages
1. Costs more than regular gas (20 cents – 30 cents)
2. Gets less mileage than regular gas (8% -20%)
3. Taxes will be higher on ethanol
4. Raises food prices
5. Attributing to food shortages
6. Small engines cannot contend with ethanol
7. Boats show poor performance and clogged fuel systems
8. More fuel consumed to make ethanol
9. Increased usage of pesticides and fertilizer
10. Ethanol creates moisture, which is not good for engines

Sources: New York Times, The Heritage Foundation, TCPalm, autobloggreen, FreedomWorks